Quoting Russell King <[email protected]>:
On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 03:07:18PM +0000, Jose Goncalves wrote:
Russell King wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 04:34:15PM -0800, Michael K. Edwards wrote:
>
>> Are you using an unpatched gcc 4.1.1? Its optimizer did nasty things
>> to us, at least on an ARM target ...
>>
>
> That's ruled out. Please think about it for a moment - serial_in()
> managed to work correctly most of the time, and then spontaneously
> changes its well-defined ABI behaviour in a way that analysis of the
> asm doesn't allow it to.
>
I'm using gcc 3.4.6.
But I agree with Russell, if it was such a problem it would hit on the
first iteration of my application and not after 1 day of executing the
same piece of code...
One thing you might think about is running memtest86 on the machine
for the same kind of time interval, just in case it's something trivial
like bad ram.
OK. That's another thing to do.
Meanwhile I've switched to another SBC and I'm now running my
application on the new unit. Lets wait and see...
José Gonçalves
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
