On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 15:10 +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> >
> > some can be used for both (PIT), but on a concept level the uses are
> > independent. The advantage of local apic over PIT is that local apic is
> > cheap to do "one shot" future events with, while the PIT will tick
> > periodic at a fixed frequency. With tickless idle.. that's not what you
> > want.
> >
>
> So with a local apic, and acpi_pm as clocksource, I shouldn't be getting timer
> interrupts?
timer interrupts as in "irq0"?
you shouldn't if you use the hrtimers/tickless stuff...
can you get us a dmesg somewhere? maybe the kernel mentions why ;)
> Yet I do. Which I assume means that the kernel will still get woken
> up very often.
if irq0 keeps increasing at 100Hz or 1000Hz or so.. then yes
--
if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com
Test the interaction between Linux and your BIOS via http://www.linuxfirmwarekit.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
