Re: [Unionfs] Re: [-mm patch] UNION_FS must depend on SLAB

For what it's worth, the new branch-management code also needs realloc():
right now I do a kfree/kalloc instead.  So I'm all for having a true
krealloc function.

Erez.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- Re: [-mm patch] UNION_FS must depend on SLAB
  - From: Josef Sipek <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [-mm patch] UNION_FS must depend on SLAB
Next by Date: Re: High CPU usage with sata_nv
Previous by thread: Re: [-mm patch] UNION_FS must depend on SLAB
Next by thread: Re: [-mm patch] UNION_FS must depend on SLAB
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]