On 02/21, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > I would rather put it in a bugfix patchset for 2.6.21 and 2.6.20-stable OK. Even better. Could you also remove br_private.h:BR_PORT_DEBOUNCE then? Oleg. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH] net/bridge/br_if.c: fix possible use-after-free in port_carrier_check()
- From: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] net/bridge/br_if.c: fix possible use-after-free in port_carrier_check()
- From: Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] net/bridge/br_if.c: fix possible use-after-free in port_carrier_check()
- From: Jarek Poplawski <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] net/bridge/br_if.c: fix possible use-after-free in port_carrier_check()
- From: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
- [RFT] bridge: eliminate port_check workqueue
- From: Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFT] bridge: eliminate port_check workqueue
- From: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFT] bridge: eliminate port_check workqueue
- From: Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] net/bridge/br_if.c: fix possible use-after-free in port_carrier_check()
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2.6.20 1/1] fbdev,mm: hecuba/E-Ink fbdev driver
- Next by Date: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add myself for cxacru (in drivers/usb/atm/)
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFT] bridge: eliminate port_check workqueue
- Next by thread: Re: [RFT] bridge: eliminate port_check workqueue
- Index(es):