Re: [patch 00/21] Xen-paravirt: Xen guest implementation for paravirt_ops interface

[Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>]

On Sat, 17 Feb 2007, Andi Kleen wrote:

> That was always its intention. It's not a direct interface to a hypervisor,
> but an somewhat abstracted interface to a "hypervisor driver" 

I thought that hypervisor driver was some binary blob that can be directly
accessed via paravirt_ops?

> But you're right that there are currently still quite a lot of hooks
> being added. I plan to be much more strict on that in the future.

And it seems that the hooks are not generic but bound to a particular 
hypervisor. Should the Xen specific stuff not be in the binary blob?


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/