On 21/02/07, Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> wrote:
On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 23:37 +0100, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> On 20/02/07, Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 19:54 +0100, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> > >
> > > Might it be 6ba9b346e1e0eca65ec589d32de3a9fe32dc5de6 commit?
> >
> > I doubt that it is, but can you revert it ?
>
> I'm using the latest kernel without this patch since 3 hours.
>
> So far so good.
But you still have those softirq pending messages, right ?
Yes
(+ new NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 02)
http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0702.2/1944.html
I think those
are pointing to the root cause of this. Still no idea how to get hold of
them. All my systems refuse to produce that. Hrmpf.
tglx
Regards,
Michal
--
Michal K. K. Piotrowski
LTG - Linux Testers Group (PL)
(http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/ltg/)
LTG - Linux Testers Group (EN)
(http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/linux_testers_group_en/)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
