Re: [Unionfs] Re: [-mm patch] UNION_FS must depend on SLAB

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Josef Sipek:
> That's the only user of malloc_sizes. It is supposed to be an optimization -
> we get the smallest sized piece of memory even if we don't need all of it.
> This way we don't reallocate & memcpy needlessly.

How about exporting ksize to modules, and introduce a new function such
like this?
Of course, adding gfp_t to its parameter list make this function more generic.

void *kzrealloc(void *p, int nused, int new_sz)
{
	void *q;

	if (new_sz <= nused)
		return p;
	if (new_sz <= ksize(p)) {
		memset(p + nused, 0, new_sz - nused);
		return p;
	}

	q = kmalloc(new_sz, GFP_KERNEL);
	if (unlikely(!q))
		return NULL;
	memcpy(q, p, nused);
	memset(q + nused, 0, new_sz - nused);
	kfree(p);
	return q;
}


Junjiro Okajima
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux