On Tuesday 20 February 2007 14:07, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
>
> > This structure is not suitable for an ioctl call, because it has
> > incompatible layout between 32 and 64 bit processes. The easiest
> > fix for this would be to change the 'name' field to an array
> > instead of a pointer.
>
> Will be fixed thanks. Just out of curiosity, could you please provide an
> example when this may be a problem.
On a 64 bit process with a 32 bit user app calling this ioctl, the kernel
would read the pointer value from the 8 bytes at the end, which means that
it will read four bytes after the end of the structure and interpret
whatever it finds as a pointer, instead of using only the first four
bytes as the lower half.
Arnd <><
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]