Re: Racy NLS behaviour in FAT (and possible other fs)

OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
> Yes. But sorry, I don't have any plan and time to fix it now.
>   

I know the feeling. :)

I just wanted to know where things stand as I have little insight into
vfat development.

> If you are using "iocharset=utf8" now, "codepage=cp???,iocharset=xxx,utf8"
> might help a bit.
>   

These tests was with the "utf8" option.

Rgds

-- 
     -- Pierre Ossman

  Linux kernel, MMC maintainer        http://www.kernel.org
  PulseAudio, core developer          http://pulseaudio.org
  rdesktop, core developer          http://www.rdesktop.org

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- Racy NLS behaviour in FAT (and possible other fs)
  - From: Pierre Ossman <[email protected]>
- Re: Racy NLS behaviour in FAT (and possible other fs)
  - From: OGAWA Hirofumi <[email protected]>
- Re: Racy NLS behaviour in FAT (and possible other fs)
  - From: Pierre Ossman <[email protected]>
- Re: Racy NLS behaviour in FAT (and possible other fs)
  - From: OGAWA Hirofumi <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [-mm patch] UNION_FS must depend on SLAB
Next by Date: Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][PATCH][2/4] Add RSS accounting and control
Previous by thread: Re: Racy NLS behaviour in FAT (and possible other fs)
Next by thread: [PATCH] ecryptfs ecryptfs_read_super path_lookup errh fix
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]