Re: [PATCH 1/3] net/bridge/br_if.c: don't use _WORK_NAR

Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yes, destroy_nbp() does dev_put(dev). del_nbp() sets dev->br_port = NULL,
> port_carrier_check() goes to "done" in that case. So everething looks safe
> to me (but again, I do not even know what the "bridge" is :), so we should
> only take care about container, nothing more.

Sounds like a plan.

> I'll try to make a patch for illustration on evening.

:-)

David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] net/bridge/br_if.c: don't use _WORK_NAR
  - From: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] net/bridge/br_if.c: don't use _WORK_NAR
  - From: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 1/3] net/bridge/br_if.c: don't use _WORK_NAR
  - From: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] net/bridge/br_if.c: don't use _WORK_NAR
  - From: David Howells <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] net/bridge/br_if.c: don't use _WORK_NAR
  - From: David Howells <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: PCI riser cards and PCI irq routing, etc
Next by Date: Re: PCI riser cards and PCI irq routing, etc
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/3] net/bridge/br_if.c: don't use _WORK_NAR
Next by thread: [PATCH 2/3] cpufreq_ondemand.c: don't use _WORK_NAR
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]