Theodore,
On Sat, 2007-02-17 at 17:49 -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
> This patch introduces the Makefile before any of the source
> files, which means it will break "git bisect" operations. Could you
> please refactor your patches so that the tree will build after any
> point in your patch series?
I actually did not mean these patches should be included to a git. We
have UBI git to pull from for these purposes. I basically manually split
the UBI sources to make UBI easier to review. I should have added an
"RFC" tag, apologies.
> BTW, I'm not personally found of having a separate .h file for
> every .c file; in my mind a much better division is a public and
> private header file.
This reflects the way of my thinking. I see UBI as a set of units with
defined interfaces. So I even physically split the interface description
into files. I still think it is easier to grasp the architecture this
way.
So, it is not distinct header for _.c_ file, it is a distinct header for
each _unit_, which is a basic architecture element of UBI.
--
Best regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
