Re: freezer problems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sunday, 18 February 2007 23:01, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 02/18, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > 
> > Appended is a patch that does something along these lines.  The necessary
> > thread_info flags are defined for i386 and x86_64, for now.
> 
> I'll try to look at this patch when I am not sooooo sleepy ...
> 
> just one small nit right now,
> 
> > --- linux-2.6.20-mm2.orig/include/asm-i386/thread_info.h	2007-02-18 19:49:34.000000000 +0100
> > +++ linux-2.6.20-mm2/include/asm-i386/thread_info.h	2007-02-18 19:50:37.000000000 +0100
> > @@ -135,6 +135,7 @@ static inline struct thread_info *curren
> >  #define TIF_IO_BITMAP		18	/* uses I/O bitmap */
> >  #define TIF_FREEZE		19	/* is freezing for suspend */
> >  #define TIF_FORCED_TF		20	/* true if TF in eflags artificially */
> > +#define TIF_FREEZER_SKIP	21	/* task freezer should not count us */
> 
> Do we need to put this flag into thread_info? It is always modified by
> "current", so it could live in task_struct->flags instead.

I thought we were running low on the task_struct->flags bits. :-)

Apart from this, we may need to set it from somewhere else in the future.

Greetings,
Rafael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux