> Except for the what appears to be instability of the irq numbers on
> simpler configurations I don't have a problem with it.
I agree that's a bit annoying and I beleive it can be fixed. In
additionm I'd like to look into exposing the domain/HW number -> virq
mapping somewhere in sysfs maybe.
> Until we find a solution for the user space side of things we seem to
> need the unsigned int irq number for user space. Now I don't want
> people mapping back and forth which is why I don't intend to provide a
> reverse function.
Ok.
> But of course there will be a for_each_irq in the genirq layer so if
> people really want to they will be able to go from the linux irq to
> an irq_desc. But we don't have to export that generically (except
> possibly something for the isa irqs).
Ok.
Ben.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
