On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 04:19:58PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-02-17 at 15:56 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > This is one of the reasons why we don't just use good old
> > > do_gettimeofday(), since it takes locks and can lead to lock recursion
> > > if parts of itself are probed.
> >
> > do_gettimeofday doesn't take locks.
> >
> > Only restriction is that you can't single step it with long
> > pauses between instructions.
>
> Err, it uses read side of xtime lock, so you can not call it from a
> place which write locks xtime lock.
Err, you can -- seqlocks never deadlock.
The only thing that doesn't work is to single step with long enough
pauses with interrupts on inbetween that the sequence numbers increase:
you get a livelock then.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
