Re: [PATCH 15/44 take 2] [UBI] scanning unit header

[Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>]

On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 06:55:40PM +0200, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> +/**
> + * ubi_scan_erase_peb - erase a physical eraseblock.
> + *
> + * @ubi: the UBI device description object
> + * @si: a pointer to the scanning information
> + * @pnum: physical eraseblock number to erase;
> + * @ec: erase counter value to write (%NAND_SCAN_UNKNOWN_EC if it is unknown)
> + *
> + * This function erases physical eraseblock 'pnum', and writes the erase
> + * counter header to it. This function should only be used on UBI device
> + * initialization stages, when the EBA unit had not been yet initialized. This
> + * function returns zero in case of success and a negative error code in case
> + * of failure.
> + */

This is a general comment that applies across your entire patchset.
It would be a lot easier to review the patchset if you put the Docbook
description of the function with the .c file instead of the .h file.
This will also make it much more likely that when you or other people
update the code function, that the documentation will get updated as
well.

I'd recommend doing this along with combining all of your *.h files
into a ubi_private.h and ubi.h file.

Regards,

							- Ted
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/