Andi Kleen wrote: >> It's for populating the pagetable in a vmalloc area. There's magic in >> > > If the lazy setup doesn't work for you you can always call vmalloc_sync() > early. > Yes, that would work. Unfortunately that's i386 arch-specific, whereas the rest of this code is generic. I guess I could just move it all to arch/i386/mm. J - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [patch 00/21] Xen-paravirt: Xen guest implementation for paravirt_ops interface
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- [patch 12/21] Xen-paravirt: Allocate and free vmalloc areas
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 12/21] Xen-paravirt: Allocate and free vmalloc areas
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 12/21] Xen-paravirt: Allocate and free vmalloc areas
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 12/21] Xen-paravirt: Allocate and free vmalloc areas
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 12/21] Xen-paravirt: Allocate and free vmalloc areas
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 12/21] Xen-paravirt: Allocate and free vmalloc areas
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- [patch 00/21] Xen-paravirt: Xen guest implementation for paravirt_ops interface
- Prev by Date: Re: [KJ] [PATCH] is_power_of_2 in ia64mm
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH(Experimental) 2/4] Revert changes to workqueue.c
- Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [patch 12/21] Xen-paravirt: Allocate and free vmalloc areas
- Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [patch 12/21] Xen-paravirt: Allocate and free vmalloc areas
- Index(es):