Re: [PATCH] i386 irq: Kill NR_IRQ_VECTORS and increase NR_IRQS

> Allowing the kernel to work on big machines without complicated
> and error prone irq remapping logic.

How much memory does this use by default? If it's much there should
be at least a CONFIG_* to make it smaller.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] i386 irq: Kill NR_IRQ_VECTORS and increase NR_IRQS
  - From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)

References:
- [PATCH] i386: irq: Kill IRQ compression
  - From: Len Brown <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] i386 irq: Kill NR_IRQ_VECTORS and increase NR_IRQS
  - From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)

Prev by Date: Re: [uml-devel] x86_64: fix 2.6.18 regression - PTRACE_OLDSETOPTIONS should be accepted
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [patch 14/21] Xen-paravirt: Add XEN config options and disable unsupported config options.
Previous by thread: [PATCH] i386 irq: Kill NR_IRQ_VECTORS and increase NR_IRQS
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] i386 irq: Kill NR_IRQ_VECTORS and increase NR_IRQS
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]