On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 23:06:45 -0800 Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]> wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 18:25:00 -0800 Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Add a new mm function apply_to_page_range()[...]
> > There was some discussion about this sort of thing last week. The
> > consensus was that it's better to run the callback against a whole pmd's
> > worth of ptes, mainly to amortise the callback's cost (a lot).
> >
> > It was implemented in
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20/2.6.20-mm1/broken-out/smaps-extract-pmd-walker-from-smaps-code.patch
>
> Yes I was looking at that and wondering what the upshot would be. I'll
> have a closer look, but it seems like it should be usable.
It's a question of who-merges-first. I wasn't planning on merging the
smaps stuff into 2.6.21.
Perhaps the best approach is to proceed as-is and clean things up once it's
all merged.
I guess your pte-at-a-time walker could be quite simply implemented underneath
the smaps pmd-at-a-time walker.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
