On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 13:26:29 -0600
Marc St-Jean <[email protected]> wrote:
> + status = *(volatile u32 *)up->port.private_data;
It distresses me that this patch uses a variable which this patch
doesn't initialise anywhere. It isn't complete.
The sub-driver code whch sets up this field shuld be included in the
patch, no?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
