Yes I can make it boolean.
Will change it in a future patch submission.
Thanks,
Sumant
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Knutsson [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 12:10 AM
To: Patro, Sumant
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; Kolli, Neela;
Yang, Bo; Patro, Sumant
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] scsi: megaraid_sas - throttle io if FW is busy
Sumant Patro wrote:
> Checks added in megasas_queue_command to know if FW is able to process
> commands within the timeout period. If number of retries is 2 or more,
> the driver stops sending cmd to FW. IO is resumed when pending cmd
> count reduces to 16 or 10 seconds has elapsed from the time cmds were
> last sent to FW.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sumant Patro <[email protected]>
> ---
>
> drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas.h | 3 ++
> 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+)
>
>
[snip]
> diff -uprN linux-feb13-new-p2/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas.h
linux-feb13-new-p3/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas.h
> --- linux-feb13-new-p2/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas.h
2007-02-13 07:22:40.000000000 -0800
> +++ linux-feb13-new-p3/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas.h
2007-02-13 11:37:09.000000000 -0800
> @@ -1102,6 +1102,9 @@ struct megasas_instance {
> atomic_t fw_outstanding;
> u32 hw_crit_error;
>
> + u8 is_busy;
>
Why not "bool is_busy:8;"? It obviously is a boolean. I would also think
false/true would be more descriptive then 0/1.
Richard Knutsson
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]