Re: [PATCH] input: extend EV_LED

[Richard Purdie <rpurdie@rpsys.net>]

On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 00:24 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > The led framework is generic. If you can write a function to turn it
> > on/off you can drive it with the LED framework.
> 
> Even if that function is slow and sleeps?

The LED class itself can call in interrupt context so you'd have to
schedule a workqueue if you need to sleep.

> > One way I've come up with is adds capability to the class to have LED
> > specific triggers and you can then expose these hardware capabilities as
> > an extra trigger specific to the LED.
> > 
> > Another proposal more specific to this use case was to have some
> > information behind the scenes which the software timer based trigger
> > could use to turn on the "hardware acceleration" if present and capable
> > of the requested mode. This might just need a function pointer in the
> > core so could be quite neat.
> 
> I do not think we want to permit this led to run in "not accelerated"
> mode. I believe i8042 accesses are pretty expensive.

Which means they probably won't work well with the standard triggers.
Not something we can do much about though...

> > Nether patch exists yet.
> 
> Yep, interested party should create one of them :-). (And I'd prefer
> the first one, due to i8042 slowness).

Right, patches welcome :)

Cheers,

Richard


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/