Re: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers
From: Gene Heskett <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 17:42:15 -0500
Cc: "v j" <[email protected]>, "Theodore Tso" <[email protected]>, "Dave Jones" <[email protected]>
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
Organization: Not detectable
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: KMail/1.9.6

On Thursday 15 February 2007, v j wrote:
>So far I have heard nothing but, "if you don't contribute, screw you."
>All this is fine. Just say so. Make it black and white. Make it
>perfectly clear what is and isn't legal. If we can't load proprietary
>modules, then so be it. It will help everybody if this is out in the
>clear, instead of resorting to stupid half measures like
>EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL.
>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers
  - From: "Michael K. Edwards" <[email protected]>
- Re: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers
  - From: "Scott Preece" <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers
  - From: Theodore Tso <[email protected]>
- Re: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers
  - From: "v j" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: sparse chokes on arch/i386/kernel/i8253.c (was: 2.6.20-mm1)
Next by Date: [PATCH] add CONFIG_PNP=y to x86_64 defconfig
Previous by thread: Re: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers
Next by thread: Re: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]

Powered by Linux