Re: [PATCH] local_t : powerpc extension - use long for powerpc32

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Feb 15, 2007, at 3:23 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:

* Kumar Gala ([email protected]) wrote:

On Feb 15, 2007, at 2:02 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:

* Kumar Gala ([email protected]) wrote:
is there a reason this isn't local_add_return(long a, local_t *l) on
ppc32?

(same comment for other functions)

- k

no, except that we use the code is taken from atomic.h and used an
int parameter. However, due to the semantics of local_t, we should
manipulate longs instead of ints, even if they are the same size on a
given architecture (ppc32 and mips32 are affectec by this).

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>

Right, this means we can simply for ppc version down to:

+static __inline__ int local_add_return(int a, local_t *l)
+{
+	int t;
+
+	__asm__ __volatile__(
+"1:	PPC_LLARX	%0,0,%2		# local_add_return\n\
+	add	%0,%1,%0\n"
+	PPC405_ERR77(0,%2)
+"	PPC_STLCX	%0,0,%2 \n\
what about the dot after stwcx ? (stwcx.) ? Is it no longer required ?

Its implied, PPC_LLARX and PPC_STLCW are #defines that expand to proper instructions.

(look in include/asm-powerpc/asm-compat.h) for the defines.

Also, the PPC405_ERR77 will preprocess out on ppc64 if you were concerned.

- k
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux