Re: loosen dependancy on rtc cmos

[David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>]

On Wednesday 14 February 2007 10:09 am, Dave Jones wrote:
> This option is useful for all of the X86 subarchs afaik (and especially X86_GENERICARCH).

You're right ... _potentially_ useful, which is the same standard used
in most of the other cases.  The "X86_PC" is debris from an early version
of this patch, which limited the code to cases where it was known to work.
The X86_PC hardware standard does standardize on this particular RTC, but
non-PC platforms can use it too.

I still need to resubmit the patch, for X86_PC, which defines the platform
device in the (common) case where PNPACPI isn't defined.  Other X86 boards
would need something similar, based on what chips are wired to the CPU.


> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>


> --- linux-2.6.20.noarch/drivers/rtc/Kconfig~	2007-02-14 13:07:07.000000000 -0500
> +++ linux-2.6.20.noarch/drivers/rtc/Kconfig	2007-02-14 13:07:13.000000000 -0500
> @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ comment "RTC drivers"
>  
>  config RTC_DRV_CMOS
>  	tristate "PC-style 'CMOS' real time clock"
> -	depends on RTC_CLASS && (X86_PC || ALPHA || ARM26 || ARM \
> +	depends on RTC_CLASS && (X86 || ALPHA || ARM26 || ARM \
>  		|| M32R || ATARI || POWERPC)
>  	help
>  	  Say "yes" here to get direct support for the real time clock
> 
> -- 
> http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
> 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/