Re: [PATCH] Fix d_path for lazy unmounts

On Wed, Feb 14, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:

> What's the point in reporting the rootfs at all -- it's never reachable to an 
> ordinary process?

/init and its childs has it as root, until it passes control over to
/sbin/init
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Fix d_path for lazy unmounts
  - From: Andreas Gruenbacher <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH] Fix d_path for lazy unmounts
  - From: Andreas Gruenbacher <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Fix d_path for lazy unmounts
  - From: Andreas Gruenbacher <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Fix d_path for lazy unmounts
  - From: Andreas Gruenbacher <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Fix d_path for lazy unmounts
Next by Date: Re: [patch 00/11] ANNOUNCE: "Syslets", generic asynchronous system call support
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Fix d_path for lazy unmounts
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Fix d_path for lazy unmounts
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]