Re: [patch] mm: NUMA replicated pagecache

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 07:09:24AM +0100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> 
> Issues:
> - Not commented. I want to change the interfaces around anyway.
> - Breaks filesystems that use filemap_nopage, but don't call filemap_mkwrite
>   (eg. XFS). Fix is trivial for most cases.
> - Haven't tested NUMA yet (only tested via a hack to do per-CPU replication)
> - Would like to be able to control replication via userspace, and maybe
>   even internally to the kernel.
> - Ideally, reclaim might reclaim replicated pages preferentially, however
>   I aim to be _minimally_ intrusive.
> - Would like to replicate PagePrivate, but filesystem may dirty page via
>   buffers. Any solutions? (currently should mount with 'nobh').

Hmm, I guess we should be able to do this for pagecache of regular files,
as filesystems should not have any business dirtying that.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux