Ingo Molnar wrote: > really, what's the point behind aio_cancel()? - sequence aio_write() aio_cancel() aio_write() with both writes going to the same place must be predictably - think beyond files. Writes to sockets, ttys, they can block and cancel must abort them. Even for files the same applies in some situations, e.g., for network filesystems. -- ➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- References:
- [patch 00/11] ANNOUNCE: "Syslets", generic asynchronous system call support
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 00/11] ANNOUNCE: "Syslets", generic asynchronous system call support
- From: Davide Libenzi <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 00/11] ANNOUNCE: "Syslets", generic asynchronous system call support
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- [patch 00/11] ANNOUNCE: "Syslets", generic asynchronous system call support
- Prev by Date: Re: [patch 05/11] syslets: core code
- Next by Date: Re: Bug in current -git tree causing dbus and gnome to chew up cpu time
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch 00/11] ANNOUNCE: "Syslets", generic asynchronous system call support
- Next by thread: Re: [patch 00/11] ANNOUNCE: "Syslets", generic asynchronous system call support
- Index(es):