Re: [patch 00/11] ANNOUNCE: "Syslets", generic asynchronous system call support

* Benjamin LaHaise <[email protected]> wrote:

> [...] interaction with set_fs()...

hm, this one should already work in the current version, because 
addr_limit is in thread_info and hence stays with the async context. Or 
can you see any hole in it?

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [patch 00/11] ANNOUNCE: "Syslets", generic asynchronous system call support
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 00/11] ANNOUNCE: "Syslets", generic asynchronous system call support
  - From: Alan <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 00/11] ANNOUNCE: "Syslets", generic asynchronous system call support
  - From: Benjamin LaHaise <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: [PATCH] Open Firmware serial port driver
Next by Date: Re: [patch 00/11] ANNOUNCE: "Syslets", generic asynchronous system call support
Previous by thread: Re: [patch 00/11] ANNOUNCE: "Syslets", generic asynchronous system call support
Next by thread: Re: [patch 00/11] ANNOUNCE: "Syslets", generic asynchronous system call support
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]