Re: SATA-performance: Linux vs. FreeBSD

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 11:25:27AM +0000, Alan wrote:
> > So where is the difference between SATA-I and SATA-II ?
> 
> All physical side if they are on the same controller when you do the
> tests. Mostly latency,

SATA-II is a highly confusing marketing term.  It is /not/ a technical
term.

In some cases there are NO differences between SATA-I and SATA-II.  You
can find 1.5Gbps non-NCQ-supporting devices claiming SATA-II.

Similarly, there is no "SATA version" word in the IDENTIFY DEVICE page,
like there are "ATA version" words.

	Jeff



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux