On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 23:26:42 -0800 (PST) Davide Libenzi <[email protected]> wrote: > > ARM-OABI also defines them, dunno why. Rmk? I suspect that OABI stands for old ABI and the alignment of 64 bit quantities changed at some point. I am pretty sure that arm is only 32bit, but I assume that they need backward compatibility for the old ABI's alignment. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell [email protected] http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Attachment:
pgp6fdQchnmwl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- [patch] (2nd try) add epoll compat code to kernel/compat.c ...
- From: Davide Libenzi <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] (2nd try) add epoll compat code to kernel/compat.c ...
- From: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] (2nd try) add epoll compat code to kernel/compat.c ...
- From: Davide Libenzi <[email protected]>
- [patch] (2nd try) add epoll compat code to kernel/compat.c ...
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH 6/6] automatic tuning applied to some kernel components
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/6] AKT - Tunable structure and registration routines
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch] (2nd try) add epoll compat code to kernel/compat.c ...
- Next by thread: Re: [patch] (2nd try) add epoll compat code to kernel/compat.c ...
- Index(es):
 |