On 2/13/07, Pavel Emelianov <[email protected]> wrote:
I have implementation that moves arbitrary task :)
Is that the one that calls stop_machine() in order to move a task
around? That seemed a little heavyweight ...
May be we can do context (container-on-task) handling lockless?
What did you have in mind?
> I thought that we solved that problem by having a tmp_bc field in the
> task_struct that would take precedence over the main bc if it was
> non-null?
Of course, but I'm commenting this patchset which doesn't have
this facility.
OK, I can add the concept in to the example too.
Paul
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
