On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 09:52:39AM +0900, Ian Kent wrote: > Indeed. > Which kernel can you use? > I believe that 2200 had another problem so can you use an fc5 kernel > later than that? I've ported your patch to 2257 (nothing special, only moved lines), and it seems to work beautifully. I'm enlarging the testing. OG. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Bad race condition in the new autofs protocol somewhere
- From: Olivier Galibert <[email protected]>
- Re: [autofs] Bad race condition in the new autofs protocol somewhere
- From: Ian Kent <[email protected]>
- Re: [autofs] Bad race condition in the new autofs protocol somewhere
- From: Olivier Galibert <[email protected]>
- Re: [autofs] Bad race condition in the new autofs protocol somewhere
- From: Ian Kent <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 1/2] Re: [autofs] Bad race condition in the new autofs protocol somewhere
- From: Ian Kent <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] Re: [autofs] Bad race condition in the new autofs protocol somewhere
- From: Olivier Galibert <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] Re: [autofs] Bad race condition in the new autofs protocol somewhere
- From: Ian Kent <[email protected]>
- Bad race condition in the new autofs protocol somewhere
- Prev by Date: Re: [v4l-dvb-maintainer] dvb shared datastructure bug?
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] nanosecond filesystem support???
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Re: [autofs] Bad race condition in the new autofs protocol somewhere
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Re: [autofs] Bad race condition in the new autofs protocol somewhere
- Index(es):
 |