Re: SATA-performance: Linux vs. FreeBSD

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/12/07, Martin A. Fink <[email protected]> wrote:
Am Montag, 12. Februar 2007 19:41 schrieben Sie:
I have to store big amounts of data coming from 2 digital cameras to disk.
Thus I have to write blocks of around 1 MB at 30 to 50 frames per second for
a long period of time. So it is important for me that the harddisk drive is
reliable in the sense of "if it is capable of 50 MB/s then it should operate
at this speed. Constantly."

Ah, here is a misunderstanding, I think. By default, Linux won't start
writing out dirty buffers until something like 40% of memory is used.
This is to help common workloads where many temporary files are
created and destroyed, or even data that gets written then overwritten
shortly after.

If the kernel were to immediately write out that dirty data, it would
be slower than leaving it in memory for those workloads. But since
that isn't best for everyone, there's a parameter that controls that
dirty threshold. Setting that to a lower value will help even out the
writeout, and start it early, just as you seem to be requesting.

Hmm, it may be one of:

/proc/sys/vm/dirty_ratio
/proc/sys/vm/dirty_background_ratio

Try tweaking those to much lower values and see if that helps.

Ray
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux