Re: Documenting MS_RELATIME

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Feb 12 2007 10:40, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > Whilst on the subject of RELATIME, is there any good reason why
> > > not to make this a default mount option ?
> > 
> > Ubuntu has been shipping with noatime as the default for some time
> > now, with no obvious problems (I'm running Ubuntu).  I see relatime as
> > an improvement on noatime.
>
>The one problem with noatime is that mutt's 'new mail arrived' breaks

Just why does not it use mtime then to check for New Mail Arrived, like 
bash does?


Jan
-- 
ft: http://freshmeat.net/p/chaostables/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux