Re: [take35 0/10] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.

> On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 13:35:10 +0300 Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]> wrote:
> Andrew, do you consider kevent for inclusion or declining?

I haven't had time to think about it in the past month or two, sorry.

However we might as well get it back in there for review-and-test - please
send a new patchset once 2.6.21-rc1 is released and copy me on it?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [take35 0/10] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
  - From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>

References:
- [take35 0/10] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
  - From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
- Re: [take35 0/10] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
  - From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
- Re: [take35 0/10] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
  - From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [IA64] swiotlb abstraction (e.g. for Xen)
Next by Date: Re: [q] kbuild for private asm-offsets (Re: [PATCH 6/10] lguest code: the little linux hypervisor.)
Previous by thread: Re: [take35 0/10] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
Next by thread: Re: [take35 0/10] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]