>Yup. How does this patch look to you? We set error_code and trap_no >for userspace faults and kernel faults which call die(). We don't set >them for kernelspace faults which are fixed up. That seems a reasonable approach. Thanks, Jan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH 2.6.21 review I] [1/25] x86_64: Add __copy_from_user_nocache
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 2.6.21 review I] [4/25] x86: kernel-mode faults pollute current->thead
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [patches] [PATCH 2.6.21 review I] [4/25] x86: kernel-mode faults pollute current->thead
- From: "Jan Beulich" <[email protected]>
- Re: [patches] [PATCH 2.6.21 review I] [4/25] x86: kernel-mode faults pollute current->thead
- From: Jeff Dike <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 2.6.21 review I] [1/25] x86_64: Add __copy_from_user_nocache
- Prev by Date: [PATCH x86 for review III] [12/29] x86_64: 32-bit ptrace mangles sixth system call argument
- Next by Date: Re: unfixed regression in 2.6.20-rc6 (since 2.6.19)
- Previous by thread: Re: [patches] [PATCH 2.6.21 review I] [4/25] x86: kernel-mode faults pollute current->thead
- Next by thread: [PATCH 2.6.21 review I] [6/25] x86_64: revert x86_64-mm-add-genapic_force
- Index(es):
 |