Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > I think that mean that everybody is happy with APi, design and set of > features. No comment means that I still have not been able to test anything since regardless of what version I tried, it failed to build. -- ➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [take35 0/10] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
- From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
- Re: [take35 0/10] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
- References:
- [take35 0/10] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
- From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
- Re: [take35 0/10] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
- From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
- Re: [take35 0/10] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
- From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
- [take35 0/10] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 3/7] containers (V7): Add generic multi-subsystem API to containers
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 6/7] containers (V7): BeanCounters over generic process containers
- Previous by thread: Re: [take35 0/10] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
- Next by thread: Re: [take35 0/10] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
- Index(es):