Alex Dubov wrote:
> I removed that line altogether (it does not really needed as mmc host will not be accessed
> anymore). The problem is more elaborate. Here, the card fails, mmc_host_remove is called without
> sleep beforehand, and "after remove" message is printed immediately after it. Only then, mmc_block
> remembers to finish its business. If I leave the sleep in place, mmc_block's stuff will get
> scheduled before the mmc_remove_host and everything will be all right.
> You may also notice that host is already powered off ("Setting ... power 0" message) and still
> mmc_block continues to make requests like nothing happened.
>
How did you do the "after remove" detection? Patch?
Rgds
--
-- Pierre Ossman
Linux kernel, MMC maintainer http://www.kernel.org
PulseAudio, core developer http://pulseaudio.org
rdesktop, core developer http://www.rdesktop.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
