Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]> writes:
>
> /**
> @@ -402,7 +405,7 @@ static __inline__ long atomic64_sub_return(long i, atomic64_t *v)
> */
> #define atomic_add_unless(v, a, u) \
> ({ \
> - int c, old; \
> + __typeof__((v)->counter) c, old; \
This change seems useless. Please drop.
In general you should enforce atomic_t vs atomic64_t types on x86, otherwise
people will write code that won't compile on other architectures
that have truly different implementations.
I would suggest using inlines.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
