Re: [PATCH 1/10] lguest: Don't rely on last-linked fallthru when no paravirt handler

On Friday 09 February 2007 10:14, Rusty Russell wrote:

> +unhandled_paravirt:
> +	/* Nothing wanted us: try to die with dignity (impossible trap). */ 
> +	movl	$0x1F, %edx
> +	pushl	$0
> +	jmp	early_fault

Please print a real message with early_printk


-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 1/10] lguest: Don't rely on last-linked fallthru when no paravirt handler
  - From: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH 0/10] lguest
  - From: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 1/10] lguest: Don't rely on last-linked fallthru when no paravirt handler
  - From: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.21
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/10] lguest: Export symbols for lguest as a module
Previous by thread: [PATCH 11/10] lguest: use disable_acpi()
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/10] lguest: Don't rely on last-linked fallthru when no paravirt handler
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]