Re: [PATCH] Use correct macros in raid code, not raw asm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Neil Brown <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use correct macros in raid code, not raw asm
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 17:43:34 -0800
Cc: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>, Rusty Russell <[email protected]>, Andrew Morton <[email protected]>, Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>, Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>, lkml - Kernel Mailing List <[email protected]>, virtualization <[email protected]>
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070102)

Neil Brown wrote:


So does this look right (no, I haven't compiled it yet)

No, the whole raid6_*_save_t should be removed. I'll try to have apatch for you later.


	-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- Re: [PATCH] Use correct macros in raid code, not raw asm
  - From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Use correct macros in raid code, not raw asm
  - From: Neil Brown <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [patch 0/3] 2.6.20 fix for PageUptodate memorder problem (try 2)
Next by Date: Re: [patch 0/3] 2.6.20 fix for PageUptodate memorder problem (try 2)
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Use correct macros in raid code, not raw asm
Next by thread: Strange oops in iret_exc with my own module
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]

Powered by Linux