Re: + search-a-little-harder-for-mkimage.patch added to -mm tree

["Mike Frysinger" <vapier.adi@gmail.com>]

On 2/8/07, Oleg Verych <olecom@flower.upol.cz> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 09:28:03AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On 2/8/07, Oleg Verych <olecom@flower.upol.cz> wrote:
> > >proposition is to substitute:
> > >     "$(CONFIG_SHELL) $(MKIMAGE)"
> > >with
> > >     "mkimage"
> >
> > this isnt a one-to-one change ... let's look at the typical
> > mkimage-missing scenario ...
>
> You are interested in presents of `mkimage', but yet we discussing its
> missing, or "Error -> Don't care" behavior.

i'm interested in having the system work for the Blackfin port and
that's it.  if people want to redefine the current standard of how
u-boot images are generated, then go for it and get the approval of
all the existing arches.

there's a difference between NACKing my changes because the patch
breaks things versus because you think the whole system should be
taking some other form.

so if you dont like the mkuboot.sh script, fine, have at it with
rewriting the system ... otherwise the patch i proposed should
continue on for inclusion.
-mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/