On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 06:21:56PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
[...]
> Moving the sample rate computation to user space sounds like the right
> idea, but why not have a more drastic version of it:
>
> Right now, all products that support this feature run at the same clock
> rate (3.2 Ghz), with cpufreq, we can reduce this to 1.6 Ghz. If I understand
> this correctly, the value depends only on the frequency, so we could simply
> hardcode this in the kernel, and print out a warning message if we ever
> encounter a different frequency, right?
Just for the record... CAB is running with 2.8 GHz. At least all the boards
I have seen.
Adrian
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
