On Thursday 08 February 2007 09:06, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote:
> > The softlock detector has a long history of false positives and
> > precious few true positives, in my experience.
>
> hm, not so the latest & lamest in my experience. The commit that made it
> quite robust was 6687a97d4041f996f725902d2990e5de6ef5cbe5, as of March
> 2006, and first showed up in 2.6.17. (OTOH, since the merge of lockdep
> the main source of soft lockups in the field has been quite severely
> reduced. Nevertheless it's still good to have it around, occasionally
> there happen other types of soft lockups too, in open-coded loops, etc.)
This reminds me the current problem in close_files()
code, where we trigger soft lockup quite regularly.
Is there any chance/interest we can solve the issue Andrew had with this
patch ?
http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/5/2/273
Thank you
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
