nobh_truncate_page question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Could some one please explain me what's happens with nobh_truncate_page?

int nobh_truncate_page(struct address_space *mapping, loff_t from)
{
........
 if ((offset & (blocksize - 1)) == 0)
                goto out;

        ret = -ENOMEM;
        page = grab_cache_page(mapping, index);
        if (!page)
                goto out;

        to = (offset + blocksize) & ~(blocksize - 1);
        ret = a_ops->prepare_write(NULL, page, offset, to);
<<<<< This prepare_write() not balanced by appropriate commit_write()
<<<<< Currently this not is fatal because this function used only
<<<<< by ext2 and jfs witch  unbalanced prepare/commit operations
<<<<< not painful.  
        if (ret == 0) {
                kaddr = kmap_atomic(page, KM_USER0);
                memset(kaddr + offset, 0, PAGE_CACHE_SIZE - offset);
                flush_dcache_page(page);
                kunmap_atomic(kaddr, KM_USER0);
                set_page_dirty(page);
        }
        unlock_page(page);
        page_cache_release(page);
out:
        return ret;
}

But we can't just call commit_write after all job done because this result in
i_size increasing till block end. Where are two possible solutions:
a) Call ->commit_write() and then restore i_size to old value.
b) Leave code as it is now, but add warning comment about prepare/commit
   balance violation.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux