Re: [PATCH] remove sb->s_files and file_list_lock usage in dquot.c

On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 07:03:05PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> With filesystems that can turn on their quota after mount time (about 
> every fs except xfs), I can surely have a ton of files open, and hence, 
> if I understand correctly, have lots of inodes instantiated.

Yes, you can in theory.  But turning on quota on a filesystem in full
steam useage is not a common use case and thus there is no point in
optimizing for it.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] remove sb->s_files and file_list_lock usage in dquot.c
  - From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH] remove sb->s_files and file_list_lock usage in dquot.c
  - From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] remove sb->s_files and file_list_lock usage in dquot.c
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] remove sb->s_files and file_list_lock usage in dquot.c
  - From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] remove sb->s_files and file_list_lock usage in dquot.c
  - From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: [PATCH 3/3] rcutorture: Remove redundant assignment to cur_ops in for loop
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] [NET] dmfe : number of fixes and features
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] remove sb->s_files and file_list_lock usage in dquot.c
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] remove sb->s_files and file_list_lock usage in dquot.c
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]