On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 10:26:56 +1100, "Neil Brown" <[email protected]> said:
> On Tuesday February 6, [email protected] wrote:
> >
> > This patch should fix the worst of the offences, but I'd like to
> > experiment and think a bit more before I submit it to stable.
> > And probably test it too - as yet I have only compile and brain
> > tested.
>
> Ok, I've experimented and tested and now I know what was causing the
> double-unlock.
>
> The following patch is suitable for 2.6.20.1 and mainline. There is
> room for a bit more improvement, but only for performance, not
> correctness. I'll look into that later.
>
> Thanks,
> NeilBrown
I figure I should test this on my hardware, but since the RAID array
resynched itself when I rebooted back into an earlier kernel version,
I'm guessing it means this bug introduced some corruption into the
array, when it occurred, so I'd like some pointers on how I can test it
out without compromising my data.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
