Re: [2.6.20][PATCH] fix mempolicy error check on a system with memory-less-node

On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Andi Kleen wrote:

> IMHO there shouldn't be any memory less nodes. The architecture code
> should not create them. The CPU should be assigned to a nearby node instead.
> At least x86-64 ensures that.

Yes I wish we would do it that way on all platforms. SGI's SN2 does that 
too.



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [2.6.20][PATCH] fix mempolicy error check on a system with memory-less-node
  - From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6.20][PATCH] fix mempolicy error check on a system with memory-less-node
  - From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [patch] MTD: fix DOC2000/2001/2001PLUS build error
Next by Date: Re: [2.6.20][PATCH] fix mempolicy error check on a system with memory-less-node
Previous by thread: Re: [2.6.20][PATCH] fix mempolicy error check on a system with memory-less-node
Next by thread: Re: [2.6.20][PATCH] fix mempolicy error check on a system with memory-less-node
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]