Christoph Lameter <[email protected]> writes: > > Would it be possible to attach the cpus to the > next nodes with memory and mark the node offline? That way we could avoid > another mask that we constantly have to check? That is what x86-64 does and I believe is the right solution to this. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [2.6.20][PATCH] fix mempolicy error check on a system with memory-less-node
- From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6.20][PATCH] fix mempolicy error check on a system with memory-less-node
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6.20][PATCH] fix mempolicy error check on a system with memory-less-node
- From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6.20][PATCH] fix mempolicy error check on a system with memory-less-node
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- [2.6.20][PATCH] fix mempolicy error check on a system with memory-less-node
- Prev by Date: Re: [2.6.20][PATCH] fix mempolicy error check on a system with memory-less-node
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC 0/28] Patches to pass vfsmount to LSM inode security hooks
- Previous by thread: Re: [2.6.20][PATCH] fix mempolicy error check on a system with memory-less-node
- Next by thread: Re: [2.6.20][PATCH] fix mempolicy error check on a system with memory-less-node
- Index(es):
 |