On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, David Miller wrote:
>
> So the idea is to just run it to completion if it won't block and use
> a fibril if it would?
That's not how the patches work right now, but yes, I at least personally
think that it's something we should aim for (ie the interface shouldn't
_require_ us to always wait for things even if perhaps an early
implementation might make everything be delayed at first)
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
